Re: [PATCH 1/2] t3200-branch: test setting branch as own upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>   Don't die to let the caller finish its
>   job in such case.

[...]

> Matthieu, can you remember anything else that
> led to that decision?

Not at all, unfortunately. I don't remember if I did that "in case
there's something like some cleanup to do" or because I had something
more precise in mind.

A case to be carefull about is if you're using the same "git branch"
command for multiple actions (trying --set-upstream in combination with
other options). But I do not see a case where this would be possible.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]