Re: [PATCH v4 08/23] ewah: compressed bitmap implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 02:17:55PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>> I don't think that's a big issue.  A pair of 4-byte reads would not be
>> too slow.
>
> The header is actually two separate 4-byte values, so that's fine. But
> between the header and trailer are a series of 8-byte data values, and
> that is what we need the 8-byte alignment for.

Sorry for the lack of clarity.  What I meant is that a 4-byte aligned
8-byte value can be read using a pair of 4-byte reads, which is less
of a performance issue than a completely unaligned value.

[...]
> Anyway, this is all academic until we are designing bitmap v2, which I
> do not plan on doing anytime soon.

Sure, fair enough. :)

Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]