Re: [PATCH v4 08/23] ewah: compressed bitmap implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:53:26PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:

>> Yes, it will.  SPARC requires all loads be naturally aligned (4-byte to
>> an address that's a multiple of 4, 8-byte to a multiple of 8, and so
>> on).  In general, architectures that do not support unaligned access
>> require natural alignment for all quantities.
>
> In that case, I think we cannot even blame Shawn. The ewah serialization
> format itself (which JGit inherited from the javaewah library) has 8
> bytes of header and 4 bytes of trailer. So packed serialized ewahs
> wouldn't be 8-byte aligned

I don't think that's a big issue.  A pair of 4-byte reads would not be
too slow.

Even on x86, aligned reads are supposed to be faster than unaligned
reads (though I haven't looked at benchmarks recently).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]