David Kastrup wrote: > So my understanding is that when we are talking about _significant_ > additions to builtin/blame.c (the current patches don't qualify as such > really) that > > a) builtin/blame.c is licensed under GPLv2 > b) significant contributions to it will not be relicensed under > different licenses without the respective contributors' explicit > consent. Yep, that's how it works. [...] > The combination of the SubmittingPatches text with the file notices in > builtin/blame.c is not really painting a full picture of the situation. Any idea how this could be made more clear? E.g., maybe we should bite the bullet and add a line to all source files that don't already state a license: /* * License: GPLv2. See COPYING for details. */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html