Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Propagating flags carefully from the command line

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:59:42PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> So this is my second try.  The second one now gets rid of the call
> to mark_blob_uninteresting() as Peff suggested, because the first
> patch makes the function very well aware that it only should mark
> the objects that are reachable from the object, and by definition
> blobs do not reach anything.
> 
> Junio C Hamano (2):
>   revision: mark contents of an uninteresting tree uninteresting
>   revision: propagate flag bits from tags to pointees

Sorry for a slow review, but I just read through your earlier comments
and this series. I agree there was definitely a bug in what we were
discussing earlier, and this looks like the right way to fix it. The end
result splits the flag-setting responsibility much more sensibly.

Thanks.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]