Re: Diagnosing stray/stale .keep files -- explore what is in a pack?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:50:33PM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As long as we can reliably determine that it is safe to do so
> > without risking races, automatically cleaning .lock files is a good
> > thing to do.
> 
> If the .lock file is a day old, it seems to me that it should be safe
> to call it stale.

Probably. The way our "lease" system works, nobody should be
holding a ref lock for more than a few milliseconds.

That being said, we do lock other things, like the index. Generally I
think the index lock should be quick, too. And similar for config file
rewrites, and shallow files. And rerere files, it looks like. My, "git
grep commit_lock_file" turns up a lot of hits. :)

So I think all of the existing uses are fine, and I suppose that most
new cases should be fine, too, because git processes tend not to last a
long time.

You asked earlier if I had a script for cleaning locks. No code worth
sharing, but I'll give an outline of what we do at GitHub. We basically
do:

  find -name *.lock -mmin +60 | xargs rm

I.e., we give only an hour.  For keep files, we give a day (since things
like hooks may run for a while under the lock, though a day is probably
excessive). And we check that it begins with "^receive-pack".

As far as I know, neither of these has ever caused any problems. Of
course, any problems might not be immediately obvious.

> Can anyone "take the lock" if there is already a lock file?

Git never takes an existing lock. It expects you to clean it up
yourself.

> For the keep files, I already drafted a script that looks inside the
> keep file, if it reads 'receive-pack [pid] [host]' it checks whether
> the hostname matches, and if so whether the pid matches a running
> process.
> 
> Only if the host matches and the pid is dead we call it stale.

That sounds reasonable.

> Seems fairly conservative to me. Are there scenarios where we think
> this can misfire?

I cannot think of any.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]