Re: [PATCH 07/19] compat: add endianness helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Vicent Marti <tanoku@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The POSIX standard doesn't currently define a `nothll`/`htonll`

typo: ntohll

> function pair to perform network-to-host and host-to-network
> swaps of 64-bit data. These 64-bit swaps are necessary for the on-disk
> storage of EWAH bitmaps if they are not in native byte order.
[...]
> +#		include <byteswap.h>

Do we need a hack on top similar to what ntoh_l and hton_l do, for
platforms that do not support unaligned access?

---- read-cache.c:1316 ----
#ifndef NEEDS_ALIGNED_ACCESS
#define ntoh_s(var) ntohs(var)
#define ntoh_l(var) ntohl(var)
#else
static inline uint16_t ntoh_s_force_align(void *p)
{
	uint16_t x;
	memcpy(&x, p, sizeof(x));
	return ntohs(x);
}
static inline uint32_t ntoh_l_force_align(void *p)
{
	uint32_t x;
	memcpy(&x, p, sizeof(x));
	return ntohl(x);
}
#define ntoh_s(var) ntoh_s_force_align(&(var))
#define ntoh_l(var) ntoh_l_force_align(&(var))
#endif

-- 
Thomas Rast
tr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]