Hi, On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 05:53:19PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > sequencer.c | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > > index 351548f..8ed9f98 100644 > > --- a/sequencer.c > > +++ b/sequencer.c > > @@ -466,10 +466,7 @@ static int allow_empty(struct replay_opts *opts, struct commit *commit) > > empty_commit = is_original_commit_empty(commit); > > if (empty_commit < 0) > > return empty_commit; > > - if (!empty_commit) > > - return 0; > > - else > > - return 1; > > + return empty_commit ? 0 : 1; > > } > > Isn't it the other way around? Moreover, 'return !!empty_commit;' > would be simpler. Considering the possible return values from is_original_commit_empty(), I think all this could be written as return is_original_commit_empty(commit); Best, Gábor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html