Re: [PATCH] sequencer: trivial cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  sequencer.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 351548f..8ed9f98 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -466,10 +466,7 @@ static int allow_empty(struct replay_opts *opts, struct commit *commit)
>         empty_commit = is_original_commit_empty(commit);
>         if (empty_commit < 0)
>                 return empty_commit;
> -       if (!empty_commit)
> -               return 0;
> -       else
> -               return 1;
> +       return empty_commit ? 0 : 1;
>  }

Isn't it the other way around? Moreover, 'return !!empty_commit;'
would be simpler.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]