On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is a testcase that checks for a problem where, during a specific >> shallow fetch where the client does not have any commits that are a >> successor of the new shallow root (i.e., the fetch creates a new >> detached piece of history), the server would simply send over _all_ >> objects, instead of taking into account the objects already present in >> the client. > > Thanks. This reminds me I should add a test case in the 4/6 to > demonstrate the regression and let it verify again in 6/6 that the > temporary regression is gone. Will reroll the series with your patch > included. No. It's too hard. The difference is what base a delta object use and checking that might not be entirely reliable because the algorithm in pack-objects might change some day. -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html