Re: Officially start moving to the term 'staging area'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> Here are the threads once again:
>>>
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/197111
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/166675
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/115666
>>
>> I take it you still haven't read those threads, and you don't plan to.
>> So I have to go through each and every comment and summarize what each
>> person concluded.
>>
>> Hopefully you would come back to me before I waste my time, but it
>> seems there's no other way to make you see the reality of what was
>> actually already discussed and agreed.
>
> So here's the summary, as I said, *everybody* is in favor of "staging
> area" or something other than "index", with the exception of Drew
> Northup, I've put a summary of the conclusion of each person that
> voiced an opinion on the matter, and I've CC'ed them here, so they can
> reiterate their opinion, or clarify it.
>
> Junio, do you accept that virtually *everyone* is in favor of "staging
> area" now?

To avoid bonces, please remove  victor.engmark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and
alexeyf@xxxxxxxxx from the CC list.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]