Re: [PATCH v3] gc: reject if another gc is running, unless --force is given

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> [...]

The other comments mostly make sense.

> After reading what the whole function does, I think the purpose of
> this function is to take gc-lock (with optionally force).  Perhaps a
> name along the lines of "lock_gc", "gc_lock", "lock_repo_for_gc",
> would be more appropriate.

The whole point of this exercise is to _not_ lock up the repo during
gc, so I can do minimal commit/ worktree/ ref update operations when
it's running.  I can't expect the reflog to work, so complex
history-rewriting operations should be avoided; that's about it, I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]