Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'll just leave it at that and let you decide what to do (presumably go > ahead as you already outlined). I've never actually ever used multiple > -L in the same log/blame invocation, anyway. Nobody has ;-). It is just between my "I often wished while looking at 'less foo.c' I wanted to give more than on -L to cover two ranges I see in the file" and your "I do not know if the user can give the first -L to cover the first range and the second -L to cover the second range". I do not think neither of us successfully gave more than one -L and got any useful result. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html