Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> The proposal currently is only for "-L /RE/,whatever" to behave in a
> relative fashion, beginning the search at the end of the last range
> specified via -L (or line 1 if there is no previous -L).
>
> Would it also make sense to support "-L +N,whatever" as relative to
> the end of the last range specified via -L (or 1 if none).
Sounds reasonable.
I'm still not sure I am super-happy with /RE/ always being relative,
though I see Junio's problem space as something worth solving. How does
it interact with -L:RE? Do you now have to know in what order the
functions appear in the source to correctly specify -L:foo -L:bar or
similarly, -L/foo/,/^}/ -L/bar/,/^}/? What if we supported +/RE/ as the
relative version?
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html