On 07/13/2013 07:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This is a regression test for a66e77eab70a08938fdc2227b7ada0f0465c6991 > > Sorry, I do not quite get this. > > If you apply the patch on top of the said commit before that commit, the > new test does not pass. > > But if you apply the patch on top of the said commit, the new test > still does not pass. > > So I am having hard time guessing what you meant by "regression > test". It is not "a66e77 broke something that ought to work, and > this shows the breakage". It is not "a66e77 fixed something and > this shows the previous breakage that got fixed." > > It may be because the test is depending on ShortName not to be > downcased incorrectly, which was to be fixed by a later commit. But > after applying this on top of jc/mailmap-case-insensitivity topic, > the test does not pass (and reverting a66e77 does not seem to affect > the result, either). > I am sorry for the bad wording, sorry for wasting your time. This patch was meant to replace 134d1ac9be2ce97c60a7e9187c32980681811cb5 (current test, latest commit on mailmap-case-insensitivity) Indeed the patch tests for both bugs unintentionally. So both the one letter name is being used and the email case sensitivity is checked. So maybe I should redo it again and make 2 explicit test cases for each of the fixes? Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html