Re: [PATCH 3/3] wt-status: use "format" function attribute for status_printf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:26:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > These functions could benefit from the added compile-time
> > safety of having the compiler check printf arguments.
> >
> > Unfortunately, we also sometimes pass an empty format string,
> > which will cause false positives with -Wformat-zero-length.
> > In this case, that warning is wrong because our function is
> > not a no-op with an empty format: it may be printing
> > colorized output along with a trailing newline.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I'm torn on this one. It really does provide us with more compile-time
> > safety checks, but it's annoying that "-Wall -Werror" will no longer
> > work out of the box.
> 
> Yeah, that is a show-stopper for me X-<.

You can "fix" it with -Wno-zero-format-length, so the hassle is not
huge. But I am also inclined to just drop this one. We have lived
without the extra safety for a long time, and list review does tend to
catch such problems in practice.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]