Re: Deleting remote branches with git-branch and reflog questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> And we might want to allow reflogs on detached HEAD someday,
>> although I personally think it goes against what detached HEAD
>> is -- it is of a very temporary nature.
>
> Didn't we agree already that reflog with detached head was simply 
> insane?

Perhaps, perhaps not.

	$ git checkout v2.6.14
        $ git checkout v2.6.15
        $ git checkout v2.6.16

Ah, which one did I check-out the last time?

	$ git describe HEAD@{1}

I suspect that we could re-implement "git bisect" without using
the special "bisect" branch (we would still be using refs/bisect
namespace).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]