Re: Deleting remote branches with git-branch and reflog questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Aren't /all/ the logged refs under "refs/" these 
> days?

Yes, so what.  It's not a big deal, and it's too late to change,
isn't it?

Seriously, I think with addition of 'git log --walk-reflogs' and
'git show-branch --reflog', there is less reason for an end user
to look at the raw .git/logs/ directory these days.  They might
not fully expose the information recorded in reflog yet, but I
think what they do show is useful and adequate.  If some useful
information is lacking from their output, we should solve that
by enhancing them, not by moving .git/logs/refs up one level to
save the end user five keystrokes to allow him to run less head
or tail on ".git/logs/heads/master".

And we might want to allow reflogs on detached HEAD someday,
although I personally think it goes against what detached HEAD
is -- it is of a very temporary nature.







-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]