Re: Deleting remote branches with git-branch and reflog questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Aren't /all/ the logged refs under "refs/" these 
> > days?
> 
> Yes, so what.  It's not a big deal, and it's too late to change,
> isn't it?
> 
> Seriously, I think with addition of 'git log --walk-reflogs' and
> 'git show-branch --reflog', there is less reason for an end user
> to look at the raw .git/logs/ directory these days.

How about introducing the shortcut "-g" for "--walk-reflogs"? It is not 
yet taken AFAICT.

> And we might want to allow reflogs on detached HEAD someday, although I 
> personally think it goes against what detached HEAD is -- it is of a 
> very temporary nature.

But so are reflogs. They go away after some time.

Disk space is cheap.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]