Yes, sorry. I find this whole story quite amusing (albeit distracting and unnecessary), but sorry for adding to the spam. I'll be quiet now. On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk > <martinvonz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Felipe Contreras >> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Stefano Lattarini >>> <stefano.lattarini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>> You need two sides to have an argument. >>> >>>> I disagree. Unless you mean than, whenever a part behaves in a >>>> hostile and aggressive way, the other part should just silently >>>> knuckle under. >>> >>> You are wrong. If a bum in the street starts talking about you about >>> why you are going to hell, and you reply to him and argue. Who has the >>> fault of starting an argument? >> >> I'm not sure I follow the analogy. Are you the bum or the passer-by? > > http://xkcd.com/386/ > > Someone is wrong on the Internet! > > Let it be. > > > m > -- > martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx > - ask interesting questions > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first > ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html