Re: MinGW port - initial work uploaded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:

> On Tuesday 2007 January 23 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > Uhm. You do understand that we use MinGW to port to, not _plain_ 
> > Windows? So we do have a "less".
> 
> Nope; I didn't.  Oh dear.  I've obviously misunderstood.  I thought 
> MinGW was for compiling to native Windows?  Do you use MinGW to compile 
> to cygwin as well?

MinGW and cygwin differ in one very important point: cygwin needs an extra 
dll, MinGW does not.

However, the development environment is still console-based, with a bash 
so you can run configure and simple bash scripts. It is definitely more 
catering to Unix types than Windows types.

So yes, there is a bash, and there is a less, and there is perl.

> > That was not Windows. That was DOS.
> 
> I'm sure pipes were still awful in Win98.  I accept though, that it is 
> possible Windows has changed in the last 9 years :-)

Win98 was based on DOS. Windows XP is based on VMS.

<tongue-in-cheek>
Yes, I know. They left everything behind, and started Windows NT anew. 
Yeah, right.
</tongue-in-cheek>

> > With less, on the other hand, you just exit the pager, or let it 
> > search through stdin. It is so much more convenient.
> 
> That sounds better than I remember.  You'll have talked me into 
> migrating to Windows soon :-)

I don't understand. The command "less" is the default pager of git, so you 
are prone to have used it already.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]