Re: MinGW port - initial work uploaded

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2007 January 23 11:32, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Maybe we have to go the other way round, just as POSIX git does: instead
> of spawning the pager, we should _beginthread() the actual work, and
> execl() the pager.

What about just forgetting paged output under Windows?  It's been a while, but 
the only decent one that I ever found was LIST.COM, and that's probably 
vanished now.

I haven't used Windows in a while, are pipes still as awful as they were?  
That is to say they cheated and redirected output to a temporary file then 
redirected that file to the input of the second process.  The upshot of which 
was you had to have the whole pipe complete before you could view the first 
page of output.

I can well imagine that in Windows I would find the paged output more painful 
than useful.



Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]