Re: [PATCH 6/6] completion: clarify ls-tree, archive, show completion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I think this is the same as 5/6 and better explained in a single
>> patch, as the rationale is the same: these commands can all take the
>> usual revs and then paths, so using misnamed complete_FILE helper is
>> wrong.
>>
>> Mind if I squashed them together?
>
> I'm okay with what you've queued in pu (sans some points raised by
> SZEDER; looking into that), but you can squash them together if you
> like.

In any case, I think it is sensible not to remove the _file
helper. We may want to fix it not to expand revname and do only the
pathname, but that is a separate issue from using _revlist_file for
the commands you updated completion for in these two patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]