Re: [PATCH 6/6] completion: clarify ls-tree, archive, show completion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think this is the same as 5/6 and better explained in a single
> patch, as the rationale is the same: these commands can all take the
> usual revs and then paths, so using misnamed complete_FILE helper is
> wrong.
>
> Mind if I squashed them together?

I'm okay with what you've queued in pu (sans some points raised by
SZEDER; looking into that), but you can squash them together if you
like.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]