Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 3/8] rebase: cherry-pick: fix sequence continuation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk
<martinvonz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> One change splits, the other change fixes, what's wrong with that?
>
> I didn't say there was anything wrong. I was asking if the bug was
> there before (and I didn't see an answer when Junio asked).

Why wouldn't it be before? Did I mention a commit that introduced a
problem? No. Did any patch in this series introduce a problem? No.

All we've done in this series is 1) reorganize the code without
introducing *ANY* functional changes, and 2) fix a bug.

If you see 1) introducing a problem, or 2) introducing a problem, then
mention that in *those* patches. If there is no problem with 1) or 2)
then it follows the problem already exists.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]