Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixing volatile HEAD in push.default = current

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I would argue that there is something to "fix", but that fix involves
> making the cp a purely atomic operation which is super-complicated,
> and totally not worth it.  Would you _not_ like the above example to
> work?

No.  I do not think I like the above example to "work", at all.

I know we live in the real world, and I do not want to see such
serializing implementations of cp or rm that try to "fix", as it
will interfere my everyday use where such a race does not matter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]