Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > There's still a lot to think about. Is there? I do not think "volatile" is particularly a good description for this, but showing what is pushed as a concrete branch name feels like a good improvement to me, at least in principle. I haven't picked them up, and I won't be picking them up today, as I suspect this series may conflict with the pre-2.0 preparation and 2.0 transition patches and I may end up having to fix conflicts unnecessarily (resolving is eventually needed before 2.0 happens, but resolving them, or even having to worry about the possibility that I may have to do so, do not have to steal time from me today). Thanks. > [3/3] is the big itch: [1/2] and [2/2] are just setup patches. > > Ramkumar Ramachandra (3): > push: factor out the detached HEAD error message > push: fail early with detached HEAD and current > push: don't push the volatile HEAD with current > > builtin/push.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html