Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So did you or did you not audit the codepath?
>
> No; I was explaining why I didn't in the first place. Going through it now.
So, this is what I have:
interpret_branch_name -> interpret_branch_name (recursion)
-> get_sha1_basic -> get_sha1 [context] (end-user data)
-> substitute_branch_name -> dwim (end-user data)
-> strbuf_branchname (callers pass a branch name; no @{u})
-> revision.c:add_pending_object [with_mode] (end-user data)
[die_]verify_filename -> builtin/rev-parse.c (end-user)
-> builtin/reset.c (end-user)
-> builtin/grep.c:cmd_grep (end-user)
-> revision.c:setup_revisions (end-user data)
We used to die in die_verify_filename() earlier, but we die in
interpret_branch_name() after the patch. Do we have to dig deeper?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html