Re: Random thoughts on "upstream"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> You can't represent push.default = single either.
>
> Right.  And I propose that we extend the refspec to be able to
> represent it, instead of having "single" sticking out like a sore
> thumb (and possibly introducing more sore thumbs like this in the
> future).

Yeah, go ahead and have fun making refspecs Turing complete. Why?
Because you decided to call something a "sore thumb". Calling
something a "sore thumb" doesn't make it so.

We, the sane people, will people will keep using simple configuration
options. Hopefully some day there won't be much need for many of the
current configurations, including push.default.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]