Re: Random thoughts on "upstream"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> If somebody implements the "push.default = single" (see the original
>> message you are responding to), then the change might be smaller.
>
> I think this is a bad hack covering up an underlying problem: it is
> ugly, confusing, and inextensible in my opinion.  I think of
> push.default as merely a default remote.<name>.push value for all
> remotes, that can be overridden on a per-remote basis.

You can't represent push.default = single either.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]