On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> I'm not sure about this. If we introduce a check that fails, we would
>> have to do:
>>
>> check HEAD refs/heads/new-branch "" failure
>>
>> Which doesn't seem clean. Perhaps it makes more sense to always add
>> the type of check:
>>
>> check HEAD ref refs/heads/new-branch
>
> I think you misunderstood. Failure looks like this:
>
> check "@@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch failure
>
> And corresponding success like this:
>
> check "@@{u}" refs/heads/upstream-branch
>
> We can make the "ref" compulsory if you like. I thought about it too.
I think it's less surprising.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html