Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I'm not sure about this. If we introduce a check that fails, we would
> have to do:
>
> check HEAD refs/heads/new-branch "" failure
>
> Which doesn't seem clean. Perhaps it makes more sense to always add
> the type of check:
>
> check HEAD ref refs/heads/new-branch
I think you misunderstood. Failure looks like this:
check "@@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch failure
And corresponding success like this:
check "@@{u}" refs/heads/upstream-branch
We can make the "ref" compulsory if you like. I thought about it too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html