Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In other words: the sequence "@" is short for "HEAD".
That is saying a very different thing. master@{4.days} is not short
for masterHEAD{4.days}.
> Isn't that
> _exactly_ what I implemented in my two-liner?
I dunno.
As design and semantics look still fuzzy (the primary one I am not
sure about is if @ is a ref or just a revision), even though the
desire to have _something_ seem to be popular, I am not particulary
interested in looking at an alternative patch. I want to see the
right semantics first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html