Junio C Hamano wrote: > [...] > You can't go any simpler than that rule, and there is no room for > confusion if that rule is properly implemented. In other words: the sequence "@" is short for "HEAD". Isn't that _exactly_ what I implemented in my two-liner? However, I'm tilting towards respecting .git/@ as a manual override. Why? Because we'd have to either claim that git symbolic-ref @ HEAD is a noop, or deny it altogether (by saying that @ is not a valid symbolic ref). The latter approach obviously sounds more sensible, but I don't like unnecessarily eating up @. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html