On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> If you accept only "@" but not "master@", that behaviour needs a >> wrong world model to understand and justify (one of which is "@ is a >> synonym for HEAD"). If your rule is "In $anything@{$n}, you can >> drop {$n} when $n==0", then HEAD@{0} becomes HEAD@ and master@{0} >> becomes master@, and @{0} becomes @ naturally. > > Besides, you're going in the wrong direction this time. You are > trying to fit an explanation to something that is useless. How is > master@ useful? It's not. The same way master^0^0~4 is not useful, yet it's works; it's a logical result from the syntax. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html