On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> If you accept only "@" but not "master@", that behaviour needs a
>> wrong world model to understand and justify (one of which is "@ is a
>> synonym for HEAD"). If your rule is "In $anything@{$n}, you can
>> drop {$n} when $n==0", then HEAD@{0} becomes HEAD@ and master@{0}
>> becomes master@, and @{0} becomes @ naturally.
>
> Besides, you're going in the wrong direction this time. You are
> trying to fit an explanation to something that is useless. How is
> master@ useful?
It's not. The same way master^0^0~4 is not useful, yet it's works;
it's a logical result from the syntax.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html