Junio C Hamano wrote:
> If you accept only "@" but not "master@", that behaviour needs a
> wrong world model to understand and justify (one of which is "@ is a
> synonym for HEAD"). If your rule is "In $anything@{$n}, you can
> drop {$n} when $n==0", then HEAD@{0} becomes HEAD@ and master@{0}
> becomes master@, and @{0} becomes @ naturally.
Besides, you're going in the wrong direction this time. You are
trying to fit an explanation to something that is useless. How is
master@ useful?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html