Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use fixed-size integers for .idx file I/O

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-                       return ntohl(*((unsigned int *) ((char *) index + (24 * mi))));
+                       return ntohl(*((uint32_t *)((char *)index + (24 * mi))));

Is that pointer gymnastics guaranteed to work?  I.e., how do we know
that we can access an uint32_t (or unsigned) at such an address?

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]