Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit
>> object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements
>> the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right.
>
> Actually, if you think about it, there is really only one way to
> specify revisions in the stash's reflog: stash@*.
> ...
> * although I'd have been more comfortable if we had a neater way to specify that
Yup. "git stash pop +4", without a must-be-it token "stash" or
mandatory "@{}" frill would have been much nicer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html