Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit >> object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements >> the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right. > > Actually, if you think about it, there is really only one way to > specify revisions in the stash's reflog: stash@*. > ... > * although I'd have been more comfortable if we had a neater way to specify that Yup. "git stash pop +4", without a must-be-it token "stash" or mandatory "@{}" frill would have been much nicer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html