Re: [PATCH] branch: colour upstream branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +       char fancy[80];
>>>
>>> -       if (show_upstream_ref)
>>> +       if (show_upstream_ref) {
>>>                 ref = shorten_unambiguous_ref(branch->merge[0]->dst, 0);
>>> +               if (want_color(branch_use_color))
>>> +                       snprintf(fancy, sizeof(fancy), "%s%s%s",
>>> +                                       GIT_COLOR_BLUE, ref, GIT_COLOR_RESET);
>>> +               else
>>> +                       strncpy(fancy, ref, sizeof(fancy));
>>> +       }
>>> +
>>
>> Please use strbuf for "fancy".
>
> Why? We would need to initialize and free it. What's the advantage?

>From a quick glance, I don't see any gurantee that "ref" (plus ansi
codes) will always fit in 80 bytes.
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]