Re: Composing git repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Lehmann wrote:
> But I think we recently learned to support that use case with
> submodules. I think there are two floating models:
>
> - Tracked:
> [...]
>
> - Untracked:
>   Some people just want "the newest" tip of a branch checked out in
>   the submodule and update that from time to time (I suspect this
>   is because they are used to SVN externals, which I believe work
>   that way). You throw away reproducibility, which I think is not
>   good and not the way I expect Git to work.
> [...]

Nope, it has nothing to do with SVN externals; I've never used them.
And no, all repositories aren't created equal.  I should be able to
add in magit.git into my dotfiles repository without worrying about
which commits the other repositories were at a particular commit.  If
my project depends on the bleeding edge of poppler and girarra, I
should always be able to tell what commits in each subproject the
build was passing in.  In other words, I should be able to freely
mixed floating and fixed submodules.  There's no reason for one to be
Right, and the other to be a shunned second-class citizen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]