Re: Composing git repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So you have to stash it somewhere.  We could have made it to move
>> them to $HOME/.safeplace or somewhere totally unrelated to the
>> superproject.  So in that sense, the repositories are *not* owned by
>> the superproject in any way.  However, you are working within the
>> context of the superproject on the submodule after all, and
>> somewhere under $GIT_DIR/ of the superorject is not too wrong a
>> place to use as such a safe place.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.

What do you _exactly_ mean by that?  You understood why things are
arranged in that way, and no longer think that it is unnecessary,
ugly and unwieldy to stash the real copy of $GIT_DIR of submodules
away from their working trees and store them inside $GIT_DIR/modules
of the superproject?

> The paths in .git/modules are unnecessary ugly and unwieldy,
> especially in the case of multiple levels of nesting...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]