Hi, On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Brian Gernhardt <benji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes. It sounds very much like you want to simply do "git add . ; git > > commit -a". But making that the default for "commit -a" would be > > obnoxious for many other people. > > I find it annoying that "commit -a" isn't implemented in terms of > "git add .". Mainly because I'll make a number of changes in Eclipse > then go back and do "commit -a" and only days later discover that > I have untracked files in my working directory which should have > been added to the commit several days ago. You mean, you _ignored_ the text "git commit -a" gives you? It really shows you the output of "git status", exactly so you know what you committed, and sometimes more importantly, what you didn't. I mean, "git commit" spends a lot of time getting that information, so you better use it. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html