On Jan 13, 2007, at 4:36 AM, Peter Baumann wrote:
On 2007-01-13, Brian Gernhardt <benji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Peter Baumann <Peter.B.Baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
Me doesn't really like the new semantics of "git-add", because it
does
two seperate things - it adds new files and it refreshes the
content of
previously known files.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/32452/
focus=32792
Should this be added to Documentation/rants/filename-
braindamage.txt? ;-)
~~ Brian
Ok. Obviously I should't have said that it add "files" (gr, silly me).
What I meant was it adds the content of files. But there is a
difference
in adding and replacing content.
I was referring to adding Linus' rant... And maybe several others.
I tend to find his rants at least slightly amusing, highly
informative, and I tend to end up agreeing. I have very little
opinion on your complaint so long as the system works consistently.
"git commit -a" is still my most common workflow. I've used git-add
(and prior to that git-update-index) from time to time when I fix
bugs that need to be separate from my current work, but far far more
common is "I finished this chunk of functionality, add all the
changes I did to make it happen".
~~ Brian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html