On Friday 2007, January 12 20:56, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> This may not actually be what we want to do. These commands are
> inherently whole-tree operations, and an inexperienced user may
> mistakenly expect a "git pull" from a subdirectory would merge
> only the subdirectory the command started from.
You're right it might be confusing at first, however, I still think it's the
right thing to do.
Here's my reasoning: for a while, with subversion as a user you feel all warm
inside that commands only work on the current subdirectory, so "svn update"
would only update the current subdirectory to the latest revision. Of course
as git users we all see the horrendous potential errors that behaviour can
induce. It creates subdirectories with mixed versions from the repository -
absolute disaster pends.
Git is of course far more sensible, if you checkout in a subdirectory the
whole working directory changes, meaning everything is always nicely in sync
and really does represent a snapshot at any time.
Now; once you (as a new user) accept that git checkout should (and does)
checkout the whole working directory regardless of where you are, then by
extension every other working-directory-wide command should do the same.
Phew. I'm too noisy. What a verbose way of saying
fromAOL("me too");
Andy
--
Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE
andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html