Re: [PATCH v2] index-pack: always zero-initialize object_entry list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It apparently relates to the use of .idx.offset to compute the "next"
> offset, cf. append_obj_to_pack():
>
> 	struct object_entry *obj = &objects[nr_objects++];
>    ...
> 	obj[1].idx.offset = obj[0].idx.offset + n;
> 	obj[1].idx.offset += write_compressed(f, buf, size);
>
> So you trashed the offset of the first object after all the objects that
> are actually *in* the patch.
>
> And with that: ACK.

Ahh, I also was scratching my head about that +1 thing.  After all,
the +1 in the argument to xrealloc() was already a clue.

Thanks both for digging to the bottom of this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]