Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > merlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Randal L. Schwartz) writes: [...] > >> That's not good. Making git-init-db when it wants git-init. > > Not good. I am _very_ tempted to do this. > > [Creates a stub manpage, saying git-init is a silly synonym for > > git-init-db] > Perhaps, but "git init-db" does a lot more than just initialise the > object database (such as setting default config-variables, installing > template hooks...). "git init" is actually a more sensible name now > adays. Changing the name of a command is a delicate matter... sounds sensible, but then make it git-init is new name in 1.5.0 (or right now) with a link to the older one (and squeak about the name change when called as git-init-db), and git-init-db is gone by 2.0.0 -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html