Junio C Hamano wrote:
merlyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Randal L. Schwartz) writes:If I cd into Documentation, and try to make "git-init.1", I get this: % make git-init.1 asciidoc -b docbook -d manpage -f asciidoc.conf git-init.txt xmlto -m callouts.xsl man git-init.xml Note: meta date : No date. Using generated date git-init-db Note: meta source : No productname or alternative git-init-db Note: meta source : No refmiscinfo@class=source git-init-db Note: meta version: No productnumber or alternative git-init-db Note: meta version: No refmiscinfo@class=version git-init-db Warn: meta source : No valid fallback. Leaving empty git-init-db Note: meta manual : No ancestor with title git-init-db Note: meta manual : No refmiscinfo@class=manual git-init-db Warn: meta manual : No valid fallback. Leaving empty git-init-db Note: Writing git-init-db.1 rm git-init.xml That's not good. Making git-init-db when it wants git-init.Not good. I am _very_ tempted to do this.
Perhaps, but "git init-db" does a lot more than just initialise the object database (such as setting default config-variables, installing template hooks...). "git init" is actually a more sensible name now adays.
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html