Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:53:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > OK, thanks for the information. IMHO it would be nice if 'git >> > format-patch' and 'git am' supported this style of inline patch >> > inclusion, but maybe there are good reasons to discourage it? >> >> "git am --scissors" is a way to process such e-mail where the patch >> submitter continues discussion in the top part of a message, >> concludes the message with: >> >> A patch to do so is attached. >> -- >8 -- >> >> and then tells the MUA to read in an output from format-patch into >> the e-mail buffer. > > Ah, nice! I didn't know about that. > >> You still need to strip out unneeded headers >> like the "From ", "From: " and "Date: " lines when you add the >> scissors anyway, and this is applicable only for a single-patch >> series, so the "feature" does not fit well as a format-patch option. > > Rather than requiring the user to manually strip out unneeded headers, > wouldn't it be friendlier and less error-prone to add a new --inline > option to format-patch which omitted them in the first place? It > should be easy to make it bail with an error when multiple revisions > are requested. Perhaps. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html