Re: Re* [PATCH 2/2] check-ignore.c: fix segfault with '.' argument from repo root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:56:44AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Adam Spiers <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Fair enough.  I'll reply to this with a new version.[0]
> >
> > [0] I wish there was a clean way to include the new version inline,
> >     but as I've noted before, there doesn't seem to be:
> >
> >     http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/146110
> 
> I find it easier to later find the patch if you made it a separate
> follow-up like you did, but you can do it this way if you really
> want to, using a scissors line, like so.  Please do not try to be
> creative and change the shape of scissors just for the sake of
> chaning it.

[snipped]

OK, thanks for the information.  IMHO it would be nice if 'git
format-patch' and 'git am' supported this style of inline patch
inclusion, but maybe there are good reasons to discourage it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]