Re: suggestions about stgit commands renaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Maybe some restucturing of commands is called for.  One possibility
> would be to go with prefixes (eg. ppush, pshow), but that does not
> address the sub-commands issue, which would have to be dealt with
> another way, possibly by multiplying commands (branch -> blist,
> bcreate, etc), which I'm not very fond of.
> 
> Another would be to generalize command groups, and acknowledge
> subcommands as such.  Eg:
> 
> stg branch --create		-> stg branch create
> stg show			-> stg patch show
> stg push			-> stg patch push
> 
> 
> The latter obviously suggests that some would want to keep "stg push"
> as an alias (here comes again the idea of programable aliases like we
> already have for GIT.

Thinking twice, the current "shortcut prefix" mechanism would already
allow us to use shortcuts like "stg p show" and "stg b create".

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]